MA SONO SOLO IO CHE HO VISTO UNO "STACCO" BELLO GROSSO TRA LE RIPRESE SUGLI SPALTI E LA RIPRESA DA LONTANO DELLA RAMPA DI LANCIO?
perchè non rispondi alle domande come faccio io? anche io vedo uno stacco bello grosso,ovvio se prima riprendi gli spalti poi riprendi il razzo in lontananza uno stacco lo dovrai pur fare.
ma a noi interessa la parte del lancio del saturnV(che come è dimostrato a volta sempre con successo,quindi quel video ritrae uno di quegli episodi,apollo 11 comunque)
la parte degli spalti possiamo tranquillamente eliminarla solo tu ti sei concentrato su quella Citazione:
e cosa dire di quel COGLIONE che attesterebbe il giusto frame rate del video confrontandolo con quello delle persone che si muovono normalmente? NON TIENE CONTO DEL CAMBIO DI RIPRESA? E ALLORA!!
ma che dici ? questo è il metodo usato per la verifica temporale del video
Citazione:
Even though Phil has confirmed that the film was shot in real-time, and that it corresponds to the true rocket speed, an extra check on such an key issue was very important.
At the first check point of the sequence Andrey Kudryavets writes [11,13], "Why rely on the film, [perhaps] it was slowed down? Well, its speed can be easily estimated from the time the Saturn V clears the service tower! So for the purpose of comparison we selected seven other available recordings of the Apollo 11 launch."
According to NASA’s documentation [12], the tower clearance time is about 9.5 secs. And this timing, in my opinion, can be trusted. The fact is that thousands of professional and (most importantly) tens of thousands of uncontrolled amateur cameras were shooting this very entertaining moment. The rocket did actually clear the tower strictly on schedule. And indeed, in Phil’s film (Fig.4) we see that the rocket rises to the height of the tower on the 9th second. Other consulted recordings [13] provide the same result.
Now to the second check point of the film. According to NASA’s record [12] the separation time of the first stage was 162 seconds into the mission. And as we see in the Phil’s film, it is on this very second that a tremendous cloud of hot gas surrounds the rocket. The impression is that the rocket is covered by a blast. After a few seconds, a glowing fragment leaves this cloud (173rd second). The shooting angle and remote distance does not allow determining what it is exactly – separation of the first stage and falling back, with the leading segment of the rocket keeping on going, or maybe something else. However in any event, a casual observer will assume this event to be the separation. And no doubt, that’s what NASA wanted.
The film-maker has confirmed that these events play back in real time. This is verified twice: at the beginning of the film on the 9th second, and at the end on the 162th second. Consequently, the film rate is confirmed as being correct, and the recording of all these events is accurate throughout the entire film.
come vedi il video è confermato al 9°secondo con il fatto che supera la torre di servizio al 162° secondo con la separazione del primo stadio
tutti dati che vengono confermati dalla nasa
solo dopo aggiunge Citazione:
Over the course of the film one can see other evidence, not as obvious, but nevertheless straightforward and clear. When viewing people walking around all movements are absolutely natural and occur at normal speed. Therefore, the timer on Phil’s film can be relied upon. Having established this timing with confidence we can see at what moment the rocket passes through the third and the highest layer of clouds (Fig. 5).
perchè tagli e riporti solo quello che ti interessa?
Citazione:
Ti rendi conto delle argomentazioni che stai portando??
Non puoi inviare messaggi. Puoi vedere le discussioni. Non puoi rispondere. Non puoi modificare. Non puoi cancellare. Non puoi aggiungere sondaggi. Non puoi votare. Non puoi allegare files. Non puoi inviare messaggi senza approvazione.