PART1

PART2

PART3

PART4

PART5

PART6

PART7

Thursday, August 23, 2007 at 7:45 AM
Re : SEPTEMBER CLUES part 7 :

A few minutes into part 7, I treat the 2 "Empire State building shots" from NBC and CBS. I hope it will be clear to everyone ( although this might be a bit of a rapid demonstration ) that this represents definitive proof of video layering by the TV networks - or whoever was in charge of the tv footage that day.

Please keep in mind that the Empire State building is placed in two drastically different positions which, if they were real shots, would more... translate into two vastly different 'camera angles'. The simple fact that the background bulidings (+ the twin towers) match perfectly (relative spacing/angle/size) as one overlays the two views, is definitive and incontrovertible proof of the gigantic fraud that was played upon us. less

Monday, July 30, 2007 at 7:33 PM
AUTHOR’S STATEMENT :

(please read this before commenting on September Clues, thanks for your time)

This statement is meant to adress a series of -in my view - important issues, given the incredible response SC has had in only a couple of months Thankfully, most of it has been positive feedback but I've seen some odd, inaccurate and unduly hostile comments on a few websites. I guess I'll have to get used to that...

My motivations are to find solely in my personal quest for more... justice in the light of the most horrid and murderous hoax of modern times. My longstanding research (helped on by every single component of the wide 911 truth movement) reached its decisive turning point when I was able to analyze the footage/audio of the Tv networks’ broadcasts of that fateful day.

I have double-checked every media (i.e.footage/audio material) that has come under my scrutiny and confronted them scrupulously with official television archives, private VHS tapes and other verifiable sources. Now, if anyone still questions the authenticity of this media, I will gladly help financing a FOIA request to retrieve the original, high-definition footage from the various tv networks - if at all possible under US law.

I initially hesitated to publish this work on the www – if only for the sheer difficulty of displaying , with the available resolution, some of the more subtle details in this study. For instance, the pixel-overlay of the ‘nose-in/nose-out’ helicopter shot (see SC part1) may look unconvincing on web-video but is extremely precise in full-size / PSD format. So, anyone wishing to prove the nose-out is a different ‘object’ than the nose-in, has a formidable task on his hands.

By now, most will agree that no plane hit the Pentagon and that no sizeable plane debris was found in Shanksville - let alone at Ground Zero. Now, as we analyze the TV broadcasts of that day, what we see emerging is only the continuation of a pattern all 911 researchers are familiar with : no solid, 'slam-dunk' proof of plane debris. Only 'flight175' was broadcast live : in fact, merely two 2sec-clips of 2-dimensional plane silhouettes were shown on live tv. Keep that in mind : that's a total of 4sec OF LIVE TV footage. All the subsequent "plane crash" clips trickled out hours, days if not years later. All of the latter also show tell-tale signs of forgery, yet none as blatant as the all-important 2 live clips. (The other existing live clips showed only a fireball - no planes).

I have, of course, drawn a personal conclusion out of this research. I am not, however, pushing any agenda or seeking personal attention. I'm nevertheless putting my twenty years+ of experience in the audio/video field at stake by ruling out beyond any reasonable doubt that the planes shown on tv (and on 'amateur' footage) were real.

What does this mean for the honest, 911 truthseekers ? It simply means having solid, tangible proof of foul play – something which has not been available for almost six years. This study does NOT invalidate the hard work of the many 911 truthseekers - let this be very clear. This is just the last - and most factual - piece of a frustrating puzzle which has taken too long to assemble.

I will gracefully listen to anyone's objections and suggestions - but I'll ask fellow truthseekers to cut the disinfo accusations. I also understand the shock this is to many decent people : to realize the extent of human evil and deceit is never a painless process - but don't place the blame on September Clues...

Peace less

Friday, July 6, 2007 at 1:40 PM
Sources and references to this research : (under completion)


1 HERE YOU CAN CHECK OUT ALL THE ORIGINAL NEWSCASTS OF 9/11 :
http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

2 HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF ALL EXISTING FOOTAGE OF "2ND PLANE HIT"
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

3 HERE IS AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF ALL THE COMPUTER SIMULATED FOOTAGE & IMAGES :
http://www.geocities.com/ua175reflections/

4 HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE NOSE-OUT more... SHOT
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/ABPlaneStudy/Chopper5Velocity2.html

5 HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ALL-ROUND RESEARCH (VIDEOS /PLANNING/ MEDIA PEOPLE INVOLVED) :
http://911logic.blogspot.com/

6 HERE'S AN INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE ABOUT THE ELITE'S
CONTROL OF THE NEWSMEDIA
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2007/02/are-there-elite-in-media.html

7 HERE IS WHY THE FADE-TO-BLACK ON CNN AND FOX HAS NO RELATION TO WTC1 ANTENNA - AND HOW THE MAJOR NETWORKS OVERTOOK THE AIRWAVES :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_audiovisual_entertainment_a ffected_by_the_September_11,_2001_attacks

8 HERE'S AN EXCELLENT INSIGHT INTO THE "IMPOSSIBLE FRAMERATE" PLANE
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2006/09/2-second-video-that-tricked-america.html

9 HERE YOU HAVE A GOOD GENERAL OVERVIEW OF 9/11'S LOOSE ENDS FALLING INTO PLACE
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2006/08/when-all-loose-ends-finally-make-sense.html

11 HERE ARE FACTS REGARDING THE 4 "PLANES"
http://w ww.arcticbeacon.com/articles/25-nov-2005.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

12 HERE IS A RESEARCH ON THE PUZZLE OF THE UNTRACEABLE AIRPLANE PASSENGERS :
http://newjersey.indymedia.org/or/2005/12/9535.shtml

13 HERE IS A STUDY ON THE 17 SECONDS DISCREPANCY OF REPORTED IMPACT TIMES:
LINK

14 HERE ARE TIDBITS ABOUT SOME EYE-WITNESSES
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/06/earlyshow/main521131.shtml

15 HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE VIDEO COMPILATION OF EYE-WITNESS REPORTS (WATCH "911 REALITY" PART1-3) :
http://www.livevideo.com/genghis6199

16 HERE ARE SOME OFFICIAL TV TRANSCRIPTS:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0208/17/cp.00.html
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/cnn091101.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/2001/abcnews091101.html

17 HERE IS AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE FRENCH FILMMAKERS :
http://www.media-criticism.com/Naudet_Brothers_09_2004.html

18 HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE OF A THINKING MAN'S LOGICAL PATH TO UNDERSTANDING 9/11
http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html

19 HERE IS THE BEST ARTICLE ON WHY THE TRUTH HAS TAKEN SO LONG TO SEEP OUT
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=closed_minds_on_911 less

Sunday, June 10, 2007 at 3:04 PM
Important note : having read some comments on well-known sites linking this research to various organizations, I want to stress that :

I am not linked to any special interests or, in fact, to anyone whatsoever. I'm a LONE researcher am not affiliated to organizations of any kind. Of course, I have a few very smart friends out there which have helped me through - you know who you are, I love you all.

Now, if anyone questions the authenticity of the TV footage used for this research more... - go to the 911 Chronology Sources Television Archive it's there for all to see :

http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

BUT BE WARNED : the entire FOX5 helicopter-shot has been edited out and replaced with planeless shot (only fireball) similar to CBS's - while commentary has remained unaltered....