Re: Definisci "complottista"
Inviato da Ashoka il 29/8/2006 0:15:31
Citazione:
Per lo meno il NIST ha scelto di copiare uno studio già pubblicato, per evitare di entrare in contraddizione con tutti gli altri studi (almeno con un concorda!)
UK report anticipated NIST calls
Virtually all conclusions in NIST’s official report into the collapse of the World Trade Center towers were reached in the UK three years ago, engineers said this week.
A major report Safety in tall buildings was published in July 2002, just 10 months after the towers collapsed (NCE 11 July 2002) by an Institution of Structural Engineers-led panel which included ICE senior vice president and Jacobs Babtie director Gordon Masterton.
Its recommendations are similar to those published by NIST. These included calls for buildings to be designed to survive complete burn out, include “robust, resilient and durable passive fire protection” and allow large-scale evacuation. It also called for regular independent audits of fire protection systems.
“The interesting thing is that the more you read the more it looks similar to what we did in the UK after 9/11,” said Masterton.
“Of the 30 recommendations 24 are identical messages to those contained in our report,” he said.
“It made me quite proud that what we produced in eight months at no cost contains recommendations so similar to a $16M (£8.8M) investigation that has taken four years to come to its conclusions.”
Non fare il furbo, Max-Piano, il report FEMA del maggio 2002 era un report non definitivo e compilato da un'equipe di volontari della ASCE, mentre il NIST ha agito ufficialmente sulla scorta di una legge federale, con 20 milioni di dollari stanziati dal Congresso e ha fornito il suo report definitivo nel 2005, ed é l'unico report ufficiale definitivo che é stato distribuito, ed in questo non c'é il minimo accenno alla teoria pancake, come chiaramente illustrato nella già citata discussione.
Anzi, il collasso é stato provocato dal fenomeno opposto!
Queste tue affermazioni possono forse avere effetto solo su chi si avvicina per la prima volta all'analisi del 9/11.
Continua pure a spacciare disinformazione.
Per lo meno il NIST ha scelto di copiare uno studio già pubblicato, per evitare di entrare in contraddizione con tutti gli altri studi (almeno con un concorda!)
UK report anticipated NIST calls
Virtually all conclusions in NIST’s official report into the collapse of the World Trade Center towers were reached in the UK three years ago, engineers said this week.
A major report Safety in tall buildings was published in July 2002, just 10 months after the towers collapsed (NCE 11 July 2002) by an Institution of Structural Engineers-led panel which included ICE senior vice president and Jacobs Babtie director Gordon Masterton.
Its recommendations are similar to those published by NIST. These included calls for buildings to be designed to survive complete burn out, include “robust, resilient and durable passive fire protection” and allow large-scale evacuation. It also called for regular independent audits of fire protection systems.
“The interesting thing is that the more you read the more it looks similar to what we did in the UK after 9/11,” said Masterton.
“Of the 30 recommendations 24 are identical messages to those contained in our report,” he said.
“It made me quite proud that what we produced in eight months at no cost contains recommendations so similar to a $16M (£8.8M) investigation that has taken four years to come to its conclusions.”
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=7&topic_id=2124&post_id=44465