Re: Falsi video ?
Inviato da Seatnineb il 24/1/2007 15:53:26
Citazione:
2 testimoni oculari che furono SUD delle torre(vuole dire che secondo la traetorria del' secondo aereo mostrata dai diversi video.......questi testimoni sarrebbero stati in grado di vedere l'aereo....se ci fu veramente un'aereo:
You cannot imagine the size and intensity of the ball of flame that just erupted from the second tower. Still, because of our vantage point, 3 blocks SE of the towers, we were not ABLE TO SEE A PLANE THAT HIT!
http://www.slamradio.net/wtc.htm.
Then a huge fireball--monstrous in size--shot out and up---like some horribly visible dragon's breath.(this was the fireball from the impact of the second jet--I DIDNT REALISE THIS UNTIL AFTER VIEWING FOOTAGE OF THE ATTACK).
http://www.panix.com/userdirs/timothy/wtc.html
Manthrax ha scritto:
2 testimoni oculari che furono SUD delle torre(vuole dire che secondo la traetorria del' secondo aereo mostrata dai diversi video.......questi testimoni sarrebbero stati in grado di vedere l'aereo....se ci fu veramente un'aereo:
You cannot imagine the size and intensity of the ball of flame that just erupted from the second tower. Still, because of our vantage point, 3 blocks SE of the towers, we were not ABLE TO SEE A PLANE THAT HIT!
http://www.slamradio.net/wtc.htm.
Then a huge fireball--monstrous in size--shot out and up---like some horribly visible dragon's breath.(this was the fireball from the impact of the second jet--I DIDNT REALISE THIS UNTIL AFTER VIEWING FOOTAGE OF THE ATTACK).
http://www.panix.com/userdirs/timothy/wtc.html
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=7&topic_id=1502&post_id=73714