Re: La teoria di Judy Wood: fantascienza o realtà?

Inviato da  bernuga il 28/9/2014 11:07:46
Avrei qualche domanda a questo punto.

1)Nella polvere del WTC e' stato trovato ferro in microsfere, da dove viene?L'acciaio puo' riconvertirsi ferro in condizioni particolari?(temperatura, ecc)
2)E' stato trovato anche polvere di vetro, come si spiega?
3)Su consensus si parla di un fenomeno nuovo, ossia fori nelle travi, per la precisione:

"Yet metallurgical studies on WTC steel brought back to WPI reveal that a novel phenomenon – called a eutectic reaction – occurred at the surface, causing intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese.”

E poi ancora:

Stating that the New York Times called these findings “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation,” the article added:

“A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges – which are curled like a paper scroll – have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes – some larger than a silver dollar – let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending – but not holes.”[15]

Poi dicono anche:
However, RJ Lee had written an earlier report in 2003, entitled “WTC Dust Signature Study,” which contained much more about iron. It said: “Particles of materials that had been modified by exposure to high temperature, such as spherical particles of iron and silicates, are common in WTC Dust . . . but are not common in ‘normal’ interior office dust.”[21] This 2003 version of the report even pointed out that, whereas iron particles constitute only 0.04 percent of normal building dust, they constituted an enormous amount of the WTC dust: 5.87 percent (meaning that there was almost 1,500 times more iron in the dust than normal).[22] This earlier version also explicitly stated that iron and other metals were “melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles.”[23]

In addition, whereas the 2004 report did not use the word “vaporize,” this earlier version spoke of temperatures “at which lead would have undergone vaporization.”[24] Accordingly, whereas the 2004 report referred to “high temperatures,” the earlier report indicated that the temperatures were not merely high but extremely high, because for lead to boil and hence vaporize, it must be heated to 1,749°C (3,180°F).[25]

Secondo voi come e' possibile?La termite che hanno usato e che e' stata ritrovata nella polvere, dovrebbe spiegare dei tagli netti alle travi, ma fori da Emmenthal?

Grazie

Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=7&topic_id=7750&post_id=261971