Re: I testimoni dellArlington National Cemetery e la rotta nord
Inviato da Tuttle il 10/7/2008 13:36:21
Per ora leggo solo, da parte ufficialista, argomenti che fanno a pieno parte delle regole standard di disinformazione.
La principale che vorrebbe innescare qualcuno qui dentro è la n°12:
"Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues."
Ma è stata tentata anche la 9:
"Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect."
Ed ovviamente anche la 14:
"Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10."
Sempre di moda la 19:
"Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance."
Mentre, ovviamente, nei covi della disinformazione professionale si fa largo uso della regina delle regole. La N°5:
"Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues."
Mentre latita definitivamente qualsiasi straccio di ragionamento pulito. Sintomo che non c'è niente da dire di fronte all'evidenza.
Ciao ciao.
La principale che vorrebbe innescare qualcuno qui dentro è la n°12:
"Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues."
Ma è stata tentata anche la 9:
"Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect."
Ed ovviamente anche la 14:
"Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10."
Sempre di moda la 19:
"Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance."
Mentre, ovviamente, nei covi della disinformazione professionale si fa largo uso della regina delle regole. La N°5:
"Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues."
Mentre latita definitivamente qualsiasi straccio di ragionamento pulito. Sintomo che non c'è niente da dire di fronte all'evidenza.
Ciao ciao.
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=3&topic_id=4477&post_id=122343