Prime voci su ciò che accadrà al G20:

Secret Plan For IMF World Dictatorship G-20 Summit In DC On 11-15-8
By Webster Tarpley
11-10-8

This is a confidential strategy paper for the November 15 G-20 summit in Washington DC. This is not a new Bretton Woods in any sense, but rather a British-steered attempt to impose the dictatorship of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the entire planet, wiping out all hope of economic recovery, the modernization of the developing countries, and national sovereignty at the same time.

Under this plan, the IMF would dictate the economic policies of all states. The IMF orthodoxy is austerity, sacrifice, deregulation, privatization, union busting, wage reductions, free trade, the race to the bottom, and prohibitions on advanced technologies. These policies would strangle humanity.

The Brazil-Russia-India-China bloc is reportedly objecting to putting so much power into the hands of the IMF, which is dominated by the US and the British, with Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Treasury Secretary Paulson of Goldman Sachs laying down the party line.

The new Chinese economic measures are the opposite of the bankers' bailouts imposed so far in the wealthier countries. The Chinese will spend $585 billion on infrastructure, transportation, housing, and food production, with special attention to railroads, airports, and roads. The Chinese package is in the spirit of the Franklin D. Roosevelt New Deal, and it will maintain forward progress for China. The US $700 billion bailout and the UK and EU versions are a futile attempt to prop up the $1.5 quadrillion derivatives bubble. Sensible economic policy starts with wiping out the derivatives cancer.

The interest of humanity can only be served by preventing the Washington conference from carrying out the plan outlined below. If Russia, China, and the developing countries can mount an effective opposition, the world will divide into two blocs - a pro-derivatives, anti-production Malthusian-monetarist bloc, which will tend to fall behind because of its own policies; and, on the other hand, an anti-derivatives, pro-production bloc of nations seeking modern technology, and the full fruits of scienitific and economic progress. Persons of good will in all nations are encouraged to mobilize to make sure that their own country joins the pro-production, anti-derivatives bloc.
Preparations the for economic summit in Washington on November 15 are well advanced. Here are the five points which are currently on the agenda to be adopted by the invited heads of state. The overall philosophy is to continue globalization by reinforcing free trade and by creating a world economic government under the IMF.

The IMF Program Reads As Follows:

1) require the credit rating agencies to be registered and monitored and submit to rules of governance;

2) halt the principle of a convergence of accounting standards and re-examine the application of the fair market value rule in the financial field, so as to improve its coherence with the rules of prudence and conservatism;

3) to resolve that no market segment, territory, or financial institution shall escape from a proportionate and adequate regulation, or at the least, surveillance;

4) set up a code of conduct to avoid excessive risk-taking in the financial industry, including in the area of compensation. Supervisors will have to follow this code in evaluating the risk profiles of financial institutions;

5) to entrust to the IMF the primary responsibility, along with the FSF (Financial Stability Forum - Basel), to recommend the necessary measures to restore confidence and stability.

The IMF must be equipped with the essential resources and suitable instruments to support countries in difficulty, and to exert its role of macroeconomic surveillance to the fullest.

fonte: http://www.rense.com/general84/secr.htm

riporto questo articolo dal manifesto:


Il New Deal viene da Pechino
Joseph Halevi


In un articolo pubblicato sulla rivista statunitense The New Republic nel 1940, Keynes osservò molto amaramente che «è politicamente impossibile in una domocrazia capitalistica organizzare la spesa (pubblica ndr) su una scala tale da comprovare la mia tesi, eccetto in una situazione di guerra». Infatti oggi la grande spesa reale proviene dalla Cina nella forma di un programma, deciso ieri dal governo di Pechino, di 586 miliardi di dollari articolato su due anni, pari al 7% del prodotto interno lordo per ciascun anno. Lo scrivemmo un mesetto fa: appena la dirigenza cinese si convince che la crisi capitalistica non è arrestabile rilancerà massicciamente l'economia interna.
Così fu poco dopo lo scoppio della crisi asiatica nel 1997, portando deliberatmente in deficit il bilancio pubblico nazionale. Raffrontiamo ora il programma cinese con ciò che sta accadendo in «occidente». Dall'inizio della crisi finanziaria nel 2007 le banche centrali hanno di fatto regalato alle banche oltre mille miliardi di dollari ma solo per tamponarne gli squarci da Titanic. Questi soldi non vanno a finanziare attività effettive. Nella maggioranza dei casi finiscono in conti che le banche private hanno presso le banche centrali oppure in buoni governativi a breve termine. Gli unici stanziamenti reali degli Usa risalgono ai 100 miliardi di dollari varati lo scorso gennaio per rimborsi fiscali una tantum. Poi nulla da nessuna parte fino alle settimane recenti quando Giappone, Corea e Germania hanno annunciato spese complessive per 311 miliardi di dollari.
Vergognosamente i governi occidentali sono stati capaci stanziare meno di 415 miliardi, appena il 70% della somma cinese quando le loro economie sono nell'insieme di gran lunga più ampie di quella di Pechino.
L'incapacità occidentale di passare da una politica di regali alle banche ad una di stimolo diretto alla domanda ed all'occupazione, deriva non solo da una precisa volontà di classe: il lavoro deve in ogni caso rimanere la variabile di aggiustamento, quindi deve restare flessibile cioè, come disse Greenspan, sottoposto ad una paura crescente. Nasce anche dalla mancanza di strumenti. Il programma cinese si basa su due assi istituzionali: un sistema bancario controllato o comunque guidato dallo Stato ed il comparto dell'industria pubblica, prevalentemente concentrato nei rami della siderurgia, chimica, cemento. La spesa verrà destinata ad obiettivi pianificabili come le infrastrutture, canalizzazioni, l'edilizia e la ricostruzione delle aree colpite dal terremoto. Le industrie statali verranno dirette a fornire le produzioni necessarie ed il sistema bancario convoglierà i finanziamenti pubblici laddove verranno coinvolte imprese private.
Meccanismi di trasmissione di questo genere per tali dimensioni in occidente ne esistevano ma sono ormai molto flebili. Negli Usa permangono nell'ambito del settore militar-industriale. 3000 nuovi aerei da guerra li producono, no problem. New Orleans non la ricostruiscono e non per mancanza di cemento. E questa sarà la montagna che il buon Obama dovrà scalare. In Giappone ed in Corea esistono attraverso il sistema monopolistico integrato che lega i grandi conglomerati e le loro banche al governo. Però tali paesi sono antikeynesiani sul piano interno dato che le capacità produttive sono strutturalmente connesse al sostegno delle esportazioni.
Per stimare l'impatto del programma cinese bisognerà studiarne i particolari. Tuttavia le aree di intervento non richiederanno grandi importazioni dato che la Cina ha le capacità produttive necessarie sebbene attingerà alla siderurgia ed ai cementifici nipponici e coreani. Potrà invece subire un rallentamento il calo delle importazioni di materie prime con ripercussioni positive sull'America latina e l'Australia. E' da sottolineare che un piano concepito dalla Cina in funzione del mercato interno e diretto dai settori statali della Rpc sta diventando l'asse di riferimento dei mercati borsistici asiatici ed europei. Il fatto è tanto più rilevante se si considera che Pechino ha apertamente detto che l'aiuto alle società finanziarie multinazionali non costituisce una priorità al cospetto della sua economia.

Brown calls on Obama to help build a global society



GORDON BROWN hailed Barack Obama’s election victory as a “dawn of hope” last night as he urged the United States to join Europe in building a new world order.
The Prime Minister used his annual foreign policy address to the City of London to call on fellow world leaders to “seize the moment” and lay foundations for the “first truly global society”.
He also reiterated the need for governments to inject more funds into their economies and resist the temptation to retreat into protectionism and isolationism in the face of the economic downturn.
Addressing the Lord Mayor of London’s banquet at the Guildhall, he said: “Just days ago, across the Atlantic, our closest ally gave new meaning to its founding creed that all are created equal; gave new strength to the notion that the American dream is for all Americans.
“Whatever one’s politics, it can surely only be a source of hope and inspiration that a nation which once would have looked at Barack Obama and defined him only by his colour today sees in him the man they want to be their President and commander-in-chief.
“As America stands at its own dawn of hope so let that hope be fulfilled through a pact with the wider world to lead and shape the 21st century as the first century of a truly global society.
“I believe that with the far-sighted leadership we have in Europe, the whole of Europe can and will work closely with the rest of the world to meet the great challenges which will illuminate our convictions and test our resolution.”
Mr Brown, who will join world leaders at a financial summit in Washington this week, added that major powers had to decide whether “to be cowed by our fears or led by our hopes” during the tough times ahead.
“I want this to become the moment when we rise to the new challenges by purposeful visionary and international leadership, leaving behind the orthodoxies of yesterday and embracing new ideas to create a better tomorrow, not as the victims of history but as shapers of an open, free trade, flexible globalisation that is also inclusive and sustainable.”
Mr Brown welcomed plans by Mr Obama and the governments of China and Germany to pump more money into their economies.
He quoted President Franklin Roosevelt, who led the US through a global recession during the 1930s: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”
“When fear overwhelms our perceptions or reality the effect is paralysing; it leaves people frozen into inaction, helpless at a time of great risk and even at a time of great opportunity too,” Mr Brown said. “But confidence in the future… is the key to bringing back confidence today.
“I am confident. Confident that we can seize the moment, grasp it together and use it to lay the foundations – optimistic, multilateralist and inclusive – on which we can build the first truly global society.”


fonte: link

Estratto da una intervista a Passera:

"Ma d'altro canto dobbiamo evitare il rischio di una recessione molto grave. I debiti eccessivi accumulati nel passato non devono impedirci di costruire il nostro futuro. Cinquanta miliardi all'anno, per alcuni anni, investiti bene, possono evitarci problemi dieci volte più grandi».

Vai con la stampante.

link

Nel video dove sono appoggiati i microfoni c'è una croce templare con accanto un crocifisso inverso

Nel video dove sono appoggiati i microfoni c'è una croce templare con accanto un crocifisso inverso

mmm...quelle sono più le proporzioni di una spada, che di una croce

la prossima settimana dovrei parlare con un mio professore universitario al quale ho mandato i sottotitoli della parte economica di zeitgeist 1 e zeitgeist addendum , secondo voi quali obiezioni potrebbe muovermi? mi vorrei trovare pronto , grazie

chiedo gentilmente allo staff di spostare il messaggio nella discussione zeitgeist (non mi sono accorto quando lho inserito che ero su questo topic)

Varie posizioni riguardo al G20 iniziano ad emergere. Molti pensano che sarà solo un inizio della discussione, Sarkozy parla di governance mondiale, mentre la Germania chiede di rimuovere il termine dai testi ufficiali.

G20 To Begin Implementation Of Global Financial Dictatorship
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, November 14, 2008

Powerbrokers attending this weekend’s watershed G-20 conference will set in motion plans for a new world economic order, the end of the dollar as the world reserve currency, and the centralization of financial power into an internationalist inner circle of regulators completely above oversight or accountability.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has already fired the opening salvo before the meeting even begins, with his call for the dollar to be demoted as the world reserve currency.

“I am leaving tomorrow for Washington to explain that the dollar cannot claim to be the only currency in the world…, that what was true in 1945 can no longer be true today,” Sarkozy stated yesterday.

Economy Minister Christine Lagarde echoed the call and suggested that the Euro could replace the dollar, but that the changeover would have to be gradual so as to reduce volatility.

“The stronger the euro, the more attractive it will be in many ways,” Lagarde told Reuters today, “It should be as gradual as possible because we don’t want at this very moment of high volatility on many markets, a major shift that would clearly induce yet more difficulties and volatility,” she added.

According to a CNN report, we learn that the agenda this weekend will be the creation of a “new global network of regulators - regulators that would presumably have power over U.S. banks,” a top down planned economy controlled by faceless international financial dictators, in addition to an increase in powers for the IMF and World Bank.

Naturally, this will be a catalyst for the wholesale looting of the taxpayer on an unprecedented and global scale. With the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury already having blazed the trail, stealing trillions of dollars in the name of bailing out the economy for the greater good while in fact hoarding all the cash for themselves, the G20 will seek to codify this grand theft larceny as a routine function of global governance.

Which is why CNN’s claim the the U.S. will seek to oppose centralization of global banking power is complete bunkum. The Fed and the U.S. Treasury has set the example, with the full support of President elect Obama, for the economic raping of the people on a scale never before witnessed. Lame duck George W. Bush’s rhetoric of warning that “government intervention is not a cure-all” is nothing more than a thin veil to mask the fact that the U.S. and the EU are in lock step on this agenda.

That agenda will be challenged by Russia and China who, aware of the fact that they have been largely frozen out of the global elite’s plans to create a new world order, have argued for a multi-polar economic system as oppose to the uni-polar plans scheme pushed by the U.S., France and Britain.

For the true purpose behind the meeting, we need look no further than the comments of Baron David de Rothschild, who this week said that the crisis will be a prelude to a new world order and a new form of global governance.

Likewise, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown also this week called for the new financial architecture to be built around the premise of “global governance,” that is, more power in fewer hands and more decisions being made by fewer people.

IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn echoes the same sentiment, telling Le Monde of the need for a “global regulation strategy” as a tool of global governance.

Sarkozy last weekend correctly summarized the mission as a charter for new “global governance” in the French government’s official proposal but Germany, apparently wary of letting the cat out of the bag, demanded that this term be removed from the official wording.
fonte: link

Naturalmente per sapere quello che realmente avverrà, di solito basta vedere cosa dicono i membri del CFR:

Pushing for global reforms at G-20
Global leaders head to Washington to discuss prospects for coordinated regulation.
By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: November 14, 2008: 11:50 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- World leaders will descend on Washington Friday to talk about what's needed to get the global economy back on track. But few expect quick fixes.

[...]

Global regulation; more power for the IMF: Other areas could garner attention during the talks, including what actions should be taken regarding credit rating agencies as well as the likelihood of any further economic stimulus.

But what could prove to be one of the trickiest parts of this and any future summits, are discussions centered around markets and large financial institutions.

World leaders seem to agree that the existing regulatory framework needs to be updated, but opinions on what steps need to be taken vary wildly.

One approach could involve granting greater powers to the Financial Stability Forum, which represents central bankers and regulators, or the International Monetary Fund, which has played a large role in recent weeks helping to bail out struggling countries.

Leading international economists, such as Daniel Gros, director of the Centre for European Policy Studies, note that the IMF's profile could be elevated to serve as an early warning system for the next crisis.

"G-20 members should boost IMF independence so it can act as a global 'whistleblower' to help call the next crisis," Gros wrote as part of a project sponsored by economics professors Barry Eichengreen and Richard Baldwin for the Centre for Economic Policy Research.

One idea that could crystallize, notes Steil from the Council on Foreign Relations, is the creation of a college of regulatory supervisors that would exchange notes about some of the trends and risks they are seeing within their own borders.

Take a large bank such as Deutsche Bank (DB), said Steil. It has a footprint in countries around the globe. If the company were to get into trouble, Germany could warn fellow regulators about the firm's weakened state and take coordinated action, helping to stave off a contagion.

"I think that idea has legs," Steil said. "There is a strong case for having at the very least international coordination to deal with systemically important financial institutions."
fonte: link

RGE Monitor, il sito di Roubini, ha un approfondito articolo sul piano in 5 punti del CFR per il G20:

http://www.rgemonitor.com/economonitor-monitor/254367/roadmap_for_the_g20

Contento di vedere che Tarpley la pensa più o meno come me. Anche se
lui semplifica un po'...

Credo che il G20, lungi dal gettare le fondamento di un NWO magari a
guida FMI, sarà un gran casino: gli USA potranno fare la voce grossa
quanto vogliono ma sono impantanati dappertutto, all'estero come in
patria -- persino Berlusconi si permette dure critiche...

Ormai di grosso hanno solo le bombe ma anche quelle bisogna sapere come
e dove usarle -- il che oggi non è affatto semplice per loro.

Qualche giorno fa, ben prima che si sapese del piano cinese da 500 mld
di euro, ho scritto qui in un thread la mia ricetta per rimettere in
piedi l'Italia (ricetta che ho giudicato però utopica date le nostre
condizioni politico/psicologiche): sono un tantino soddisfatto adesso
di apprendere che i cinesi hanno intenzione di fare sul serio per loro
quel che io auspicavo per l'Italia. Potrei chiedere il copyright se non
fossi così legato all'open source...

Non serve essere Machiavelli per capire l'essenziale che serve ed ho
come l'impressione che la Germaniona non passerà molto tempo prima che
si butti in un'impresa simile -- alla faccia della UE. Nel frattempo
vedremo se Obama ci fa o ci è, se cioè è solo un burattino nelle mani
di quelli che perseguono ancora la "globalizzazione all'americana" (che
ha portato alla presente situazione) o se sarà in grado di dare una
sterzata lungo questa brutta china magari consigliato bene in tal
senso. A vedere i primi nomi sono un po' pessimista ma le sensazioni
contano un'acca.

Comunque mi rivolgo ai tanti tementi un NWO: se c'è un momento buono
per mandare a puttane quel disegno/progetto/speranza allora è QUESTO
momento. L'ha capito anche Berlusconi...

Citazione:

Una sterzata? Obama? No di sicuro. E' un pupazzo come lo fu Bush.
Le decisioni che prenderà saranno dettate dagli strateghi come Zbigniew Brezinsky del CFR e del RIIA al soldo di Rockefeller, Rothschild e tutta la cupola massonica, gli stessi che davano ordini a Bush tramite Cheney (anche lui membro del CFR), che non fanno l'interesse ne degli Stati Uniti ne dell'Inghilterra, ma della City di Londra, uno stato sovranazionale che le nazioni vuole solo distruggerle non certo aiutarle.

E visto che dici che Tarpley la pensa come te, immagino saprai cosa pensa di Obama:

The men behind Barack Obama - part 1


The men behind Barack Obama - part 2


E nei primi minuti di questo video puoi vedere Rockefeller che ringrazia personalmente Cheney durante un convegno del CFR per i servigi resi dall'amministrazione Bush:

inquietante quando Tarpley parla di crisi dei missili in Polonia dato che il vice di Obam,Powell e la Albright hanno parlato di una crisi a cui Obama dovrà fare fronte...

Per cloud

inserisci pure il tuo intervento nel topic di zeitgeist con un normale messaggio, ed in seguito si procederà a rimuovere i due messaggi da questo topic.

Citazione:
E' la bandiera della City di Londra e la croce rovesciata è una spada.

Citazione:


Mi sono lasciato prendere dall'entusiasmo, uno che parla di NWO, con quello che sembra un crocifisso inverso
Comunque quel simbolo è sicuramente templare, la croce rossa e la spada sono due simboli templari, ma anche rosacrociani ...

E' la bandiera della City di Londra e la croce rovesciata è una spada.

sì, è quello che volevo esprimere due giorni fa (ho riletto e ho capito perchè)

15 novembre 2008 - 21.36
G20: il comunicato finale

WASHINGTON - "Un piano d'azione concreto e preciso per ristabilire la fiducia": è quanto hanno convenuto i paesi del G20, che si sono dati tempo fino al 31 marzo prossimo per elaborare "una lista iniziale delle specifiche misure da prendere , incluse le azioni prioritarie" per rilanciare la crescita e stabilizzare i mercati. Ecco di seguito i punti principali del comunicato.

PIU' COOPERAZIONE: "Siamo determinati a rafforzare la nostra cooperazione per rilanciare la crescita mondiale e raggiungere le necessarie riforme nel sistema finanziario globale". "Gli sforzi" per sostenere la crescita e stabilizzare i mercati devono proseguire", si legge nel comunicato, dove si precisa che "significative azioni" per stabilizzare i mercati e sostenere l'economia sono già state prese. "Ma c'é bisogno di fare di più per stabilizzare i mercati e rilanciare la crescita".

RILANCIARE CRESCITA: "Per affrontare il deteriormaneto delle condizioni economiche, servono politiche di ampio raggio, basate su una più stretta cooperazione economica". Per il rilancio della crescita dovremo: continuare nei nostri sforzi e assumere le azioni necessarie per stabilizzare il sistema finanziario; riconoscere l'importanza del sostegno che può arrivare dalle politiche economiche e fiscali; utilizzare misure fiscali per stimolare la domanda nazionale; aiutare i paesi emergenti e in via di sviluppo e in questo contesto il ruolo del Fmi è "importante"; assicurare che Fmi e Banca Mondiale abbiano le risorse sufficienti; incoraggiare la Banca Mondiale e le altre banche dedite allo sviluppo a utilizzare tutta la propria capacità per sostenere l'agenda dello sviluppo.

MERCATI FINANZIARI: Il G20 ha convenuto sulla necessità di "proposte concrete per la sorveglianza, la trasparenza e la regolamentazione dei mercati".

NUOVO INCONTRO: I leader del G20 si sono accordati per un nuovo incontro entro il 30 aprile al fine di verificare la messa in atto dei principi convenuti.

PIU' PESO A PAESI EMERGENTI IN FMI: I capi di stato e di governo del G20 hanno convenuto di accrescere la rappresentatività dei paesi in via di sviluppo sia nel Fondo Monetario Internazionale sia nella Banca Mondiale. Più in generale il G20 è convenuto sulla necessità di rivedere le strutture nate da Bretton Woods.

CHIUDERE DOHA ROUND ENTRO ANNO: Il G20 chiede che sia raggiunto un accordo entro l'anno sul Doha Round.

SDA-ATS
fonte: link

Testo ufficiale integrale rilasciato dai leader del G20:

G-20 Statement on Financial Markets, World Economy: Full Text

Nov. 15 (Bloomberg) -- The following is a reformatted version of the full text of the statement released today by the leaders of the Group of 20 developed and emerging-market nations after meeting in Washington:

1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, held an initial meeting in Washington on November 15, 2008, amid serious challenges to the world economy and financial markets. We are determined to enhance our cooperation and work together to restore global growth and achieve needed reforms in the world’s financial systems.

2. Over the past months our countries have taken urgent and exceptional measures to support the global economy and stabilize financial markets. These efforts must continue. At the same time, we must lay the foundation for reform to help to ensure that a global crisis, such as this one, does not happen again. Our work will be guided by a shared belief that market principles, open trade and investment regimes, and effectively regulated financial markets foster the dynamism, innovation, and entrepreneurship that are essential for economic growth, employment, and poverty reduction.

Root Causes of the Current Crisis

3. During a period of strong global growth, growing capital flows, and prolonged stability earlier this decade, market participants sought higher yields without an adequate appreciation of the risks and failed to exercise proper due diligence. At the same time, weak underwriting standards, unsound risk management practices, increasingly complex and opaque financial products, and consequent excessive leverage combined to create vulnerabilities in the system. Policy- makers, regulators and supervisors, in some advanced countries, did not adequately appreciate and address the risks building up in financial markets, keep pace with financial innovation, or take into account the systemic ramifications of domestic regulatory actions.

4. Major underlying factors to the current situation were, among others, inconsistent and insufficiently coordinated macroeconomic policies, inadequate structural reforms, which led to unsustainable global macroeconomic outcomes. These developments, together, contributed to excesses and ultimately resulted in severe market disruption.

Actions Taken and to Be Taken

5. We have taken strong and significant actions to date to stimulate our economies, provide liquidity, strengthen the capital of financial institutions, protect savings and deposits, address regulatory deficiencies, unfreeze credit markets, and are working to ensure that international financial institutions (IFIs) can provide critical support for the global economy.

6. But more needs to be done to stabilize financial markets and support economic growth. Economic momentum is slowing substantially in major economies and the global outlook has weakened. Many emerging market economies, which helped sustain the world economy this decade, are still experiencing good growth but increasingly are being adversely impacted by the worldwide slowdown.

7. Against this background of deteriorating economic conditions worldwide, we agreed that a broader policy response is needed, based on closer macroeconomic cooperation, to restore growth, avoid negative spillovers and support emerging market economies and developing countries. As immediate steps to achieve these objectives, as well as to address longer-term challenges, we will:

* Continue our vigorous efforts and take whatever further actions are necessary to stabilize the financial system.

* Recognize the importance of monetary policy support, as deemed appropriate to domestic conditions.

* Use fiscal measures to stimulate domestic demand to rapid effect, as appropriate, while maintaining a policy framework conducive to fiscal sustainability.

* Help emerging and developing economies gain access to finance in current difficult financial conditions, including through liquidity facilities and program support. We stress the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) important role in crisis response, welcome its new short-term liquidity facility, and urge the ongoing review of its instruments and facilities to ensure flexibility.

* Encourage the World Bank and other multilateral development banks (MDBs) to use their full capacity in support of their development agenda, and we welcome the recent introduction of new facilities by the World Bank in the areas of infrastructure and trade finance.

* Ensure that the IMF, World Bank and other MDBs have sufficient resources to continue playing their role in overcoming the crisis.

Common Principles for Reform of Financial Markets

8. In addition to the actions taken above, we will implement reforms that will strengthen financial markets and regulatory regimes so as to avoid future crises. Regulation is first and foremost the responsibility of national regulators who constitute the first line of defense against market instability. However, our financial markets are global in scope, therefore, intensified international cooperation among regulators and strengthening of international standards, where necessary, and their consistent implementation is necessary to protect against adverse cross-border, regional and global developments affecting international financial stability. Regulators must ensure that their actions support market discipline, avoid potentially adverse impacts on other countries, including regulatory arbitrage, and support competition, dynamism and innovation in the marketplace. Financial institutions must also bear their responsibility for the turmoil and should do their part to overcome it including by recognizing losses, improving disclosure and strengthening their governance and risk management practices.

9. We commit to implementing policies consistent with the following common principles for reform.

* Strengthening Transparency and Accountability: We will strengthen financial market transparency, including by enhancing required disclosure on complex financial products and ensuring complete and accurate disclosure by firms of their financial conditions. Incentives should be aligned to avoid excessive risk-taking.

* Enhancing Sound Regulation: We pledge to strengthen our regulatory regimes, prudential oversight, and risk management, and ensure that all financial markets, products and participants are regulated or subject to oversight, as appropriate to their circumstances. We will exercise strong oversight over credit rating agencies, consistent with the agreed and strengthened international code of conduct. We will also make regulatory regimes more effective over the economic cycle, while ensuring that regulation is efficient, does not stifle innovation, and encourages expanded trade in financial products and services. We commit to transparent assessments of our national regulatory systems.

* Promoting Integrity in Financial Markets: We commit to protect the integrity of the world’s financial markets by bolstering investor and consumer protection, avoiding conflicts of interest, preventing illegal market manipulation, fraudulent activities and abuse, and protecting against illicit finance risks arising from non-cooperative jurisdictions. We will also promote information sharing, including with respect to jurisdictions that have yet to commit to international standards with respect to bank secrecy and transparency.

* Reinforcing International Cooperation: We call upon our national and regional regulators to formulate their regulations and other measures in a consistent manner. Regulators should enhance their coordination and cooperation across all segments of financial markets, including with respect to cross-border capital flows. Regulators and other relevant authorities as a matter of priority should strengthen cooperation on crisis prevention, management, and resolution.

* Reforming International Financial Institutions: We are committed to advancing the reform of the Bretton Woods Institutions so that they can more adequately reflect changing economic weights in the world economy in order to increase their legitimacy and effectiveness. In this respect, emerging and developing economies, including the poorest countries, should have greater voice and representation. The Financial Stability Forum (FSF) must expand urgently to a broader membership of emerging economies, and other major standard setting bodies should promptly review their membership. The IMF, in collaboration with the expanded FSF and other bodies, should work to better identify vulnerabilities, anticipate potential stresses, and act swiftly to play a key role in crisis response.

Tasking of Ministers and Experts

10. We are committed to taking rapid action to implement these principles. We instruct our Finance Ministers, as coordinated by their 2009 G-20 leadership (Brazil, UK, Republic of Korea), to initiate processes and a timeline to do so. An initial list of specific measures is set forth in the attached Action Plan, including high priority actions to be completed prior to March 31, 2009.

In consultation with other economies and existing bodies, drawing upon the recommendations of such eminent independent experts as they may appoint, we request our Finance Ministers to formulate additional recommendations, including in the following specific areas:

* Mitigating against pro-cyclicality in regulatory policy;

* Reviewing and aligning global accounting standards, particularly for complex securities in times of stress;

* Strengthening the resilience and transparency of credit derivatives markets and reducing their systemic risks, including by improving the infrastructure of over-the-counter markets;

* Reviewing compensation practices as they relate to incentives for risk taking and innovation;

* Reviewing the mandates, governance, and resource requirements of the IFIs; and

* Defining the scope of systemically important institutions and determining their appropriate regulation or oversight.

11. In view of the role of the G-20 in financial systems reform, we will meet again by April 30, 2009, to review the implementation of the principles and decisions agreed today.

Commitment to an Open Global Economy

12. We recognize that these reforms will only be successful if grounded in a commitment to free market principles, including the rule of law, respect for private property, open trade and investment, competitive markets, and efficient, effectively regulated financial systems. These principles are essential to economic growth and prosperity and have lifted millions out of poverty, and have significantly raised the global standard of living. Recognizing the necessity to improve financial sector regulation, we must avoid over-regulation that would hamper economic growth and exacerbate the contraction of capital flows, including to developing countries.

13. We underscore the critical importance of rejecting protectionism and not turning inward in times of financial uncertainty. In this regard, within the next 12 months, we will refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, imposing new export restrictions, or implementing World Trade Organization (WTO) inconsistent measures to stimulate exports. Further, we shall strive to reach agreement this year on modalities that leads to a successful conclusion to the WTO’s Doha Development Agenda with an ambitious and balanced outcome. We instruct our Trade Ministers to achieve this objective and stand ready to assist directly, as necessary. We also agree that our countries have the largest stake in the global trading system and therefore each must make the positive contributions necessary to achieve such an outcome.

14. We are mindful of the impact of the current crisis on developing countries, particularly the most vulnerable. We reaffirm the importance of the Millennium Development Goals, the development assistance commitments we have made, and urge both developed and emerging economies to undertake commitments consistent with their capacities and roles in the global economy. In this regard, we reaffirm the development principles agreed at the 2002 United Nations Conference on Financing for Development in Monterrey, Mexico, which emphasized country ownership and mobilizing all sources of financing for development.

15. We remain committed to addressing other critical challenges such as energy security and climate change, food security, the rule of law, and the fight against terrorism, poverty and disease.

16. As we move forward, we are confident that through continued partnership, cooperation, and multilateralism, we will overcome the challenges before us and restore stability and prosperity to the world economy.

Action Plan to Implement Principles for Reform

This Action Plan sets forth a comprehensive work plan to implement the five agreed principles for reform. Our finance ministers will work to ensure that the taskings set forth in this Action Plan are fully and vigorously implemented. They are responsible for the development and implementation of these recommendations drawing on the ongoing work of relevant bodies, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an expanded Financial Stability Forum (FSF), and standard setting bodies.

Strengthening Transparency and Accountability

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* The key global accounting standards bodies should work to enhance guidance for valuation of securities, also taking into account the valuation of complex, illiquid products, especially during times of stress.

* Accounting standard setters should significantly advance their work to address weaknesses in accounting and disclosure standards for off-balance sheet vehicles.

* Regulators and accounting standard setters should enhance the required disclosure of complex financial instruments by firms to market participants.

* With a view toward promoting financial stability, the governance of the international accounting standard setting body should be further enhanced, including by undertaking a review of its membership, in particular in order to ensure transparency, accountability, and an appropriate relationship between this independent body and the relevant authorities.

* Private sector bodies that have already developed best practices for private pools of capital and/or hedge funds should bring forward proposals for a set of unified best practices. Finance Ministers should assess the adequacy of these proposals, drawing upon the analysis of regulators, the expanded FSF, and other relevant bodies.

Medium-term actions

* The key global accounting standards bodies should work intensively toward the objective of creating a single high- quality global standard.

* Regulators, supervisors, and accounting standard setters, as appropriate, should work with each other and the private sector on an ongoing basis to ensure consistent application and enforcement of high-quality accounting standards.

* Financial institutions should provide enhanced risk disclosures in their reporting and disclose all losses on an ongoing basis, consistent with international best practice, as appropriate. Regulators should work to ensure that a financial institution’ financial statements include a complete, accurate, and timely picture of the firm’s activities (including off- balance sheet activities) and are reported on a consistent and regular basis.

Enhancing Sound Regulation

Regulatory Regimes

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* The IMF, expanded FSF, and other regulators and bodies should develop recommendations to mitigate pro-cyclicality, including the review of how valuation and leverage, bank capital, executive compensation, and provisioning practices may exacerbate cyclical trends.

Medium-term actions

* To the extent countries or regions have not already done so, each country or region pledges to review and report on the structure and principles of its regulatory system to ensure it is compatible with a modern and increasingly globalized financial system. To this end, all G-20 members commit to undertake a Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) report and support the transparent assessments of countries’ national regulatory systems.

* The appropriate bodies should review the differentiated nature of regulation in the banking, securities, and insurance sectors and provide a report outlining the issue and making recommendations on needed improvements. A review of the scope of financial regulation, with a special emphasis on institutions, instruments, and markets that are currently unregulated, along with ensuring that all systemically-important institutions are appropriately regulated, should also be undertaken.

* National and regional authorities should review resolution regimes and bankruptcy laws in light of recent experience to ensure that they permit an orderly wind-down of large complex cross-border financial institutions.

* Definitions of capital should be harmonized in order to achieve consistent measures of capital and capital adequacy.

Prudential Oversight

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* Regulators should take steps to ensure that credit rating agencies meet the highest standards of the international organization of securities regulators and that they avoid conflicts of interest, provide greater disclosure to investors and to issuers, and differentiate ratings for complex products. This will help ensure that credit rating agencies have the right incentives and appropriate oversight to enable them to perform their important role in providing unbiased information and assessments to markets.

* The international organization of securities regulators should review credit rating agencies’ adoption of the standards and mechanisms for monitoring compliance.

* Authorities should ensure that financial institutions maintain adequate capital in amounts necessary to sustain confidence. International standard setters should set out strengthened capital requirements for banks’ structured credit and securitization activities.

* Supervisors and regulators, building on the imminent launch of central counterparty services for credit default swaps (CDS) in some countries, should: speed efforts to reduce the systemic risks of CDS and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions; insist that market participants support exchange traded or electronic trading platforms for CDS contracts; expand OTC derivatives market transparency; and ensure that the infrastructure for OTC derivatives can support growing volumes.

Medium-term actions

* Credit Ratings Agencies that provide public ratings should be registered.

* Supervisors and central banks should develop robust and internationally consistent approaches for liquidity supervision of, and central bank liquidity operations for, cross-border banks.

Risk Management

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* Regulators should develop enhanced guidance to strengthen banks’ risk management practices, in line with international best practices, and should encourage financial firms to reexamine their internal controls and implement strengthened policies for sound risk management.

* Regulators should develop and implement procedures to ensure that financial firms implement policies to better manage liquidity risk, including by creating strong liquidity cushions.

* Supervisors should ensure that financial firms develop processes that provide for timely and comprehensive measurement of risk concentrations and large counterparty risk positions across products and geographies.

* Firms should reassess their risk management models to guard against stress and report to supervisors on their efforts.

* The Basel Committee should study the need for and help develop firms’ new stress testing models, as appropriate.

* Financial institutions should have clear internal incentives to promote stability, and action needs to be taken, through voluntary effort or regulatory action, to avoid compensation schemes which reward excessive short-term returns or risk taking.

* Banks should exercise effective risk management and due diligence over structured products and securitization.

Medium -term actions

* International standard setting bodies, working with a broad range of economies and other appropriate bodies, should ensure that regulatory policy makers are aware and able to respond rapidly to evolution and innovation in financial markets and products.

* Authorities should monitor substantial changes in asset prices and their implications for the macroeconomy and the financial system.

Promoting Integrity in Financial Markets

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* Our national and regional authorities should work together to enhance regulatory cooperation between jurisdictions on a regional and international level.

* National and regional authorities should work to promote information sharing about domestic and cross-border threats to market stability and ensure that national (or regional, where applicable) legal provisions are adequate to address these threats.

* National and regional authorities should also review business conduct rules to protect markets and investors, especially against market manipulation and fraud and strengthen their cross-border cooperation to protect the international financial system from illicit actors. In case of misconduct, there should be an appropriate sanctions regime.

Medium -term actions

* National and regional authorities should implement national and international measures that protect the global financial system from uncooperative and non-transparent jurisdictions that pose risks of illicit financial activity.

* The Financial Action Task Force should continue its important work against money laundering and terrorist financing, and we support the efforts of the World Bank - UN Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative.

* Tax authorities, drawing upon the work of relevant bodies such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), should continue efforts to promote tax information exchange. Lack of transparency and a failure to exchange tax information should be vigorously addressed.

Reinforcing International Cooperation

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* Supervisors should collaborate to establish supervisory colleges for all major cross-border financial institutions, as part of efforts to strengthen the surveillance of cross-border firms. Major global banks should meet regularly with their supervisory college for comprehensive discussions of the firm’s activities and assessment of the risks it faces.

* Regulators should take all steps necessary to strengthen cross-border crisis management arrangements, including on cooperation and communication with each other and with appropriate authorities, and develop comprehensive contact lists and conduct simulation exercises, as appropriate.

Medium -term actions

* Authorities, drawing especially on the work of regulators, should collect information on areas where convergence in regulatory practices such as accounting standards, auditing, and deposit insurance is making progress, is in need of accelerated progress, or where there may be potential for progress.

* Authorities should ensure that temporary measures to restore stability and confidence have minimal distortions and are unwound in a timely, well-sequenced and coordinated manner.

Reforming International Financial Institutions

Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009

* The FSF should expand to a broader membership of emerging economies.

* The IMF, with its focus on surveillance, and the expanded FSF, with its focus on standard setting, should strengthen their collaboration, enhancing efforts to better integrate regulatory and supervisory responses into the macro- prudential policy framework and conduct early warning exercises.

* The IMF, given its universal membership and core macro- financial expertise, should, in close coordination with the FSF and others, take a leading role in drawing lessons from the current crisis, consistent with its mandate.

* We should review the adequacy of the resources of the IMF, the World Bank Group and other multilateral development banks and stand ready to increase them where necessary. The IFIs should also continue to review and adapt their lending instruments to adequately meet their members’ needs and revise their lending role in the light of the ongoing financial crisis.

* We should explore ways to restore emerging and developing countries’ access to credit and resume private capital flows which are critical for sustainable growth and development, including ongoing infrastructure investment.

* In cases where severe market disruptions have limited access to the necessary financing for counter-cyclical fiscal policies, multilateral development banks must ensure arrangements are in place to support, as needed, those countries with a good track record and sound policies.

Medium -term actions

* We underscored that the Bretton Woods Institutions must be comprehensively reformed so that they can more adequately reflect changing economic weights in the world economy and be more responsive to future challenges. Emerging and developing economies should have greater voice and representation in these institutions.

* The IMF should conduct vigorous and even-handed surveillance reviews of all countries, as well as giving greater attention to their financial sectors and better integrating the reviews with the joint IMF/World Bank financial sector assessment programs. On this basis, the role of the IMF in providing macro-financial policy advice would be strengthened.

* Advanced economies, the IMF, and other international organizations should provide capacity-building programs for emerging market economies and developing countries on the formulation and the implementation of new major regulations, consistent with international standards.
Last Updated: November 15, 2008 14:46 EST

fonte: link

grazie santa , ma il professore mi ha risposto con una mail..... mi hadetto che ovviamente ci sono delle verità ma estremizzate e tipizzate, e mi ha invitato a seguire un suo corso..... (non credo abbia voglia di spiegarmi una mazza al ricevimento)

Commovente video delle proteste in Islanda, il primo paese caduto vittima della crisi economica. I cittadini islandesi tirano uova davanti parlamento, colpevole di aver portato alla bancarotta il paese, ma nessun politico esce neanche per scusarsi...



Per chi vuole saperne di più su quanto avvenuto in Islanda, qui c'è un ottimo articolo del Financial Times: Letter from Iceland

Praticamente si son fatti una chiacchierata tra amici... questo e' il risultato del primo G-20.

La Gran Bretagna va dritta nell'oblio:link


Crisi mercati: Citigroup, sta per annunciare 50mila tagli (Cnbc)

(Il Sole 24 Ore Radiocor) - New York, 17 nov - Il gruppo bancario Usa Citigroup vuole tagliare fino a un massimo di 50mila posti di lavoro, riducendo il numero dei dipendenti a 300mila. Lo ha anticipato la stazione televisiva Cnbc, citando diverse fonti. Secondo Cnbc, il ceo del gruppo bancario, Vikram Pandit, informera' i dipendenti del piano in un incontro in programma intorno alle 14 ora europea. Il piano sara' attuato con un blocco del turnover e misure di licenziamento e riguardera' tutti i settori e le aree geografiche di attivita' della banca.

Ammazza che botta!

http://www.movisol.org/08news281.htm

link

(ANSA) - ROMA, 18 NOV - L'evasione fiscale riguarda tutti i settori economici e in alcuni casi produce effetti grotteschi. "A Nord un defunto su due non si avvale dei servizi di tumulazione, in pratica si autotumula da solo. Al Sud la situazione peggiora perché a non avvalersi dei servizi funebri sarebbero due morti su tre". Questo almeno quanto risulta dai dati fiscali riferiti da Maurizio Leo, Presidente della Commissione parlamentare per l'Anagrafe tributaria. Leo, intervenendo ad un convegno sul federalismo fiscale presso la Scuola di Polizia tributaria della Gdf, ha spiegato come per l'economia italiana il problema dell'evasione fiscale sia ancora molto consistente: "L'evasione - ha sottolineato - si aggira intorno ai 100 miliardi di euro, sette punti di Pil, vale quasi quanto la spesa sanitaria. Sull'evasione di massa bisogna cambiare filosofia". Per Leo, per esempio, "i dati sui conti correnti debbono poter essere a disposizione dell'amministrazione fiscale, anche senza tutte le autorizzazioni complicate previste oggi. Ci vogliono però maggiori garanzie per i contribuenti. Il prelevamento non può essere equiparato ad un compenso in nero". Per combattere l'evasione, per l'esperto fiscale del Pdl il futuro potrebbe essere nel "borsellino elettronico". "Bisogna andare oltre alla social card - dice - e immaginare un borsellino elettronico sul quale vengano caricate alcune prestazioni e attraverso il quale vengono pagati servizi a scalare. Con questo borsellino ogni passaggio sarebbe tracciabile e dunque lo strumento potrebbe contribuire a contrastare l'evasione".(ANSA)

..

..

Arrivano, arrivano, arrivano.....

Il tema "Nuovo Ordine Mondiale" si affaccia sempre meno velatamente nelle notizie, ad es in questa notizia Sarkozy parla di un prossimo vertice sul tema del "Nuovo Mondo":

http://www.gazzettadiparma.it/primo_piano_dettaglio.php?id=8305

Con questo borsellino ogni passaggio sarebbe tracciabile e dunque lo strumento potrebbe contribuire a contrastare l'evasione

Almeno fino a quando il denaro arriva nelle casse del Tesoro, poi... Mistero Misterioso!

Nouriel Roubini: "Il peggio deve ancora venire..."

Spettacolo! Su Comedonchisciotte c'e' una lista (assai incompleta) delle ultime frasi famose.

Crack 2008 - Lo stupidario dei sedicenti “grandi” manager, “eccelsi” economisti, guru ed analisti finanziari - La prossima volta ci rivolgeremo al mago Otelma e, forse, andrà meglio


Wall Street ha già in canna il rimbalzo

Wesbury Brian, capo economista di First Trust Portfolio - società di gestione di Chicago, consulente accademico della Federal Reserve Bank di Chicago e collaboratore della tv finanziaria Cnbc, “Entro la fine del 2008 l’indice Dow Jones arriverà a 15.000 punti, perché adesso è sottovalutato del 25%, secondo il mio modello basato sui profitti aziendali e sui tassi di interesse. Anche sugli utili delle società Usa prevalgono le buone notizie: finora circa la metà dei componenti l’ indice S&P500 ha annunciato i risultati del quarto trimestre 2007 e fra le società non finanziarie ben il 73% ha battuto le aspettative. Quando la paura se ne andrà via, Wall Street si riprenderà” Corriere della Sera 4 febbraio 2008

Dominique Strauss Kahn direttore generale del Fondo Monetario Internazionale (FMI) “Il peggio è probabilmente alle spalle” Repubblica 13 giugno 2008.

Alessandro Profumo amministratore delegato di Unicredit “il peggio è alle spalle La banca è solida, non ci sarà alcun aumento di capitale” Corriere della sera 9 maggio 2008

Paul Krugman economista e professore di Economia e di Relazioni Internazionali all’Università di Princeton “mutui subprime, il peggio alle spalle” Corriere della Sera 11 maggio 2008

Henry Paulson ministro USA del tesoro “«il peggio potrebbe essere passato. Siamo più vicini alla fine che al principio della crisi finanziaria. È indubbio che oggi la situazione sia migliore, molto migliore che a marzo.” Corriere della Sera 8 maggio 2008

Giuliano Cesareo Direttore Generale di Bipiemme Private Banking Sim “il peggio sembra passato. Cauti acquisti, le prede non mancano” Corriere della Sera 5 maggio 2008

Maria Fiorini Ramirez proclamata migliore Financial Advisor del mondo e consulente della Banca del Giappone “Ora impieghi sicuri. Dall’ estate si può tornare sulle azioni, magari quelle delle banche ripulite” Corriere della Sera 25 febbraio 2008

Bob Doll alla guida degli investimenti azionari di BlackRock, il gigante statunitense del risparmio gestito “Aumentare il peso delle grandi azioni americane, non sottovalutare i mercati ad alta crescita e cavalcare le materie prime come investimenti di lungo termine” Corriere della Sera 7 luglio 2008

José Manuel Barroso presidente della Commissione Europea “La crisi in Europa sarà attenuata” Corriere della Sera 19 aprile 2008

Pietro Cirenei, direttore generale di Bipiemme Gestioni “E’ ora di tornare a Wall Street” Corriere della Sera 9 giugno 2008

Il partito del rimbalzo “Piazza Affari salirà del 6% da qui a fine anno e farà meglio dei listini europei. Ma è Wall Street la più sicura” Corriere della Sera 14 aprile 2008

Robert Stovall della società di gestione Wood Asset Management “Wall Street quest’ anno non chiuderà in rosso, proprio perché hanno vinto i Giants, una delle squadre «originali» della National Football League. La Borsa invece va male quando vince una delle squadre entrate nella Lega dopo la sua fusione con l’ American Football League, come i Patriots” Corriere della sera 11 febbraio 2008

Pietro Giuliani, “timoniere” di Azimut “Mi riempirei di azioni al 100%». So bene che lo scivolo non è finito. I mercati potrebbero perdere un altro 10%». E la dico anche più grossa: andrei anche a leva, utilizzando i derivati per superare il limite del 100%. Perché a questi prezzi in Borsa non compreremo più per parecchi anni” Corriere della Sera 7 luglio 2008

Donald Luskin, fondatore e chief investment officer di Trend Macrolytics, una società di consulenza economica per investitori istituzionali “Macché recessione. I risparmiatori non devono farsi incantare dalla propaganda dei candidati alla Casa Bianca e devono invece cogliere le opportunità della Borsa americana che, ad eccezione del settore finanziario, è oggi molto attraente per il livello scontato delle quotazioni e le buone prospettive di crescita dei profitti” Corriere della Sera 28 aprile 2008

Nigel Bolton, responsabile del team azionario Europa di BlackRock, uno dei dei colossi americani del risparmio gestito “Sono convinto che i minimi assoluti dei listini siano stati toccati nel marzo scorso ed è molto difficile che le Borse possano scendere al di sotto delle soglie di resistenza raggiunte tre mesi fa” Corriere della Sera 30 giugno 2008

Jeremy Siegel professore di Finanza alla Wharton business school “Le valutazioni attuali di Borsa sono molto più ragionevoli, anche rispetto al 1997. Dieci anni fa il rapporto fra prezzi delle azioni e utili aziendali, relativi ai 12 mesi precedenti, era attorno a 25-26, oggi è 17,6. Inoltre le alternative alle azioni non sono attraenti, anzi sono terribili: i titoli di Stato Usa sono carissimi e rendono pochissimo (meno del 4% lordo i decennali), le obbligazioni aziendali offrono un poco di più, ma non molto, e i prezzi delle case continuano a scendere. Credo che la parte peggiore sia passata” Corriere della Sera 26 maggio 2008

Alain Bokobza, capo della ricerca azionaria e strategist del colosso bancario francese Société Générale “Se volevate farvi prendere dal panico dovevate farlo prima, ormai è troppo tardi. Il piano di intervento per 700 miliardi di dollari allo studio del Tesoro americano per liberare le banche dai titoli in sofferenza, insieme al salvataggio di Fannie Mae e di Freddie Mac ha dato un segnale forte. La volatilità rimane molto elevata, ma i mercati mostrano segni di recupero. in atto una efficace strategia congiunta della politica monetaria e di quella fiscale. I rialzi della settima scorsa non sono frutto di euforia ingiustificata” Corriere della Sera 29 settembre 2008

Federico Mobili, gestore azionario di Bnp Paribas Am “Per il momento penso che sia più realistico ipotizzare un rialzo dell’ indice di circa il 7% entro la fine del 2008, ma anche noi siamo convinti che sia giunto il momento di impegnarsi di più sul mercato statunitense rispetto alle borse europee” Corriere della Sera 15 settembre 2008

Rick Wagoner amministratore delegato della casa automobilistica di Detroit General Motors “Per General Motors il peggio dovrebbe essere ormai passato” Corriere della Sera 13 agosto 2008

La lista andrebbe aggiornata.....

Ci vogliono però maggiori garanzie per i contribuenti. Il prelevamento non può essere equiparato ad un compenso in nero". Per combattere l'evasione, per l'esperto fiscale del Pdl il futuro potrebbe essere nel "borsellino elettronico". "

"Maggiori garanzie per i contribuenti."

Altro regalo per il quale dovremo ringraziare la feccia fottiwelfare.