Re:'Antibufala' e 'Antiantibufala'...

Inviato da  francesco7 il 5/10/2007 19:29:46
Notate qualche differenza tra questo video ed il reperto A? Vi invito a leggere questa discussione (anche se in inglese) a questo link in particolare il commento dell'utente KILL YOUR TV! in riferimento al reperto A: "Sure, the bulding damage seems to be the same in both pics. My "photoshop" comment was about the smoke specifically.

( note: I have had formal training with this software and have been using Photoshop professionally, daily, for 10 years. )

From my eyes it could too easily be fake. Smoke is easy to duplicate in Photoshop because it's so hazy and undefined. What bugs me most is the general shape and forms of the smoke - especially down the corner of the building... IT"S WAY TOO NEAT! Notice also at this corner where the smoke begins... it's almost a straight grey line! Too perfect. That much smoke from a fire "so big" wouldn't behave in such a controlled and disciplined way! Imperfections are what makes organic forms like billowing smoke look "real". When things are neat and ordered like this we tend to see the evidence of what we in the trade call "retouching".
My guess is there was much less smoke in the original shot, they just duped a whole lot more! Leaving you with an image which makes it very difficult to asess the actual condition of the building. A SMOKE SCREEN if I ever saw one!
This is just a gut feel from an ageing Photoshop Jockey :P the only way to prove this would be to find the original shot on negative".

P.S. Ci vuole un pò di pazienza per vedere il video perchè è di circa 5 Mb.

Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=5&topic_id=3839&post_id=100876