Re: The last word on the 911 Pentagon matter
Inviato da SirEdward il 4/9/2007 19:17:36
Citazione:
Dall'articolo di Vanity Fair
10:07:16
CLEVELAND CENTER: We got a United 93 out here. Are you aware of that?
WATSON: United 93?
CLEVELAND CENTER: That has a bomb on board.
WATSON: A bomb on board?! And this is confirmed? You have a [beacon code], sir?
CLEVELAND CENTER: No, we lost his transponder.
Wow!
10:10:31
NASYPANY (to floor): Negative. Negative clearance to shoot.… Goddammit!…
FOX: I'm not really worried about code words at this point.
NASYPANY: Fuck the code words. That's perishable information. Negative clearance to fire. ID. Type. Tail.
wow!
poco dopo
HUCKABONE: It was our guys [the fighters from Langley].
CITINO: Yup. It was our guys they saw. It was our guys they saw—Center saw.
FOX: New York did the same thing….
CITINO: O.K., Huck. That was cool. We intercepted our own guys.
wow!!
poco dopo
10:15:00
WATSON: United nine three, have you got information on that yet?
WASHINGTON CENTER: Yeah, he's down.
WATSON: What—he's down?
WASHINGTON CENTER: Yes.
WATSON: When did he land? Because we have confirmation—
WASHINGTON CENTER: He did—he did—he did not land.
WATSON: Oh, he's down down?
MALE VOICE: Yes. Yeah, somewhere up northeast of Camp David.
WATSON: Northeast of Camp David.
WASHINGTON CENTER: That's the—that's the last report. They don't know exactly where.
wow!!!
Sono andati in giro per più di dieci minuti cercando un aereo che era già precipitato? C'era un bel casino, eh?
E poi le proiezioni sulla rotta le facevano, anche senza sapere dove si trovasse l'aereo né se fosse ancora in aria:
http://www.crono911.net/docs/FAASUM.pdf
controlla su --- 9:44:31
Cerchiamo di non scherzare.
A proposito, chi te lo ha detto che non si eseguono le poiezioni sulle tracce radar per cercare di capire dove si sta dirigendo un aereo che è stato perso di vista?
Cerchiamo di non scherzare
Se il radar della FAA becca il blip ogni 7 secondi e lo segue lungo quel tragitto vuol dire che c'era un aereo lungo quel tragitto!
Ashoka
Dall'articolo di Vanity Fair
10:07:16
CLEVELAND CENTER: We got a United 93 out here. Are you aware of that?
WATSON: United 93?
CLEVELAND CENTER: That has a bomb on board.
WATSON: A bomb on board?! And this is confirmed? You have a [beacon code], sir?
CLEVELAND CENTER: No, we lost his transponder.
Wow!
10:10:31
NASYPANY (to floor): Negative. Negative clearance to shoot.… Goddammit!…
FOX: I'm not really worried about code words at this point.
NASYPANY: Fuck the code words. That's perishable information. Negative clearance to fire. ID. Type. Tail.
wow!
poco dopo
HUCKABONE: It was our guys [the fighters from Langley].
CITINO: Yup. It was our guys they saw. It was our guys they saw—Center saw.
FOX: New York did the same thing….
CITINO: O.K., Huck. That was cool. We intercepted our own guys.
wow!!
poco dopo
10:15:00
WATSON: United nine three, have you got information on that yet?
WASHINGTON CENTER: Yeah, he's down.
WATSON: What—he's down?
WASHINGTON CENTER: Yes.
WATSON: When did he land? Because we have confirmation—
WASHINGTON CENTER: He did—he did—he did not land.
WATSON: Oh, he's down down?
MALE VOICE: Yes. Yeah, somewhere up northeast of Camp David.
WATSON: Northeast of Camp David.
WASHINGTON CENTER: That's the—that's the last report. They don't know exactly where.
wow!!!
Sono andati in giro per più di dieci minuti cercando un aereo che era già precipitato? C'era un bel casino, eh?
E poi le proiezioni sulla rotta le facevano, anche senza sapere dove si trovasse l'aereo né se fosse ancora in aria:
http://www.crono911.net/docs/FAASUM.pdf
controlla su --- 9:44:31
Cerchiamo di non scherzare.
A proposito, chi te lo ha detto che non si eseguono le poiezioni sulle tracce radar per cercare di capire dove si sta dirigendo un aereo che è stato perso di vista?
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=3&topic_id=3763&post_id=98819