Re: Analisi foto lunari 2

Inviato da  Fabrizio70 il 20/2/2009 18:27:05
A proposito di radiazioni e pellicole la Kodak , visto l'aumento dei viaggi in aereo con relativi passaggi sotto scanner a raggi x ha pubblicato una pagina apposita al problema:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/publications/tib5201.jhtml?pq-path=5035&locsvcsEntryPath=4937

Ebbene basta UN SOLO passaggio per rovinare l'immagine , una dose praticamente insignificante , dopo CINQUE passaggi la pellicola è totalmente inservibile e la dose accumulata non è che sia aumentata di molto...

Citazione:

Motion picture, professional films and special processes

Travelers probably shouldn't worry about possible X-ray damage when hand-carrying their film onto the airplane unless they are carrying:



Highly sensitive X-ray or scientific films.

Film with an ISO speed or Exposure Index (EI) of 400 or higher.

Any motion picture films.

Film of any speed that is exposed to X-ray surveillance more than 5 times (the effect of X-ray screening is cumulative).

Film that is or will be underexposed. (See Note 1 below.)

Film that you intend to "push process." (See Note 2 below.

In any of these cases, you should request visual inspection of your film and of any cameras containing film. Depending on the format(s) of film you have, carrying a light-tight changing bag may be advisable to help the inspection process. Remember that this is only a guaranteed option in U.S. air travel. Outside of the U.S. you are required to comply with the local standards and regulations.


Quelle pellicole non dovrebbero esistere, altro che 25 rem....

Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=13&topic_id=970&post_id=134316